Welcome to a new Sitcom Tuesday! Today we’re continuing our coverage of the best episodes from Cheers (1982-1993), one of the most consistently written situation comedies of all time and second only to I Love Lucy as my personal favorite. I’m pleased to announce that every episode has been released on DVD.
The staff and regular patrons of a neighborhood Boston bar share the highs and lows of their daily lives. Cheers stars TED DANSON as Sam Malone, SHELLEY LONG as Diane Chambers, RHEA PERLMAN as Carla Tortelli, JOHN RATZENBERGER as Cliff Clavin, GEORGE WENDT as Norm Peterson, WOODY HARRELSON as Woody Boyd, and KELSEY GRAMMER as Dr. Frasier Crane.
The Diane era of Cheers comes to a gripping conclusion in this, the show’s fifth season, which is perhaps the funniest and most classic-filled to date. The gradual broadening of the series’ humor has reached a nice balance with the writing’s hallmark intelligence, culminating in a season filled with fresh ideas, great character moments, and ultimately, a decent swan song for the show’s most complex character. However, for those fans, like myself, who revere the early seasons for the respect the writing bestows upon the audience — rarely asking that we suspend our disbelief beyond the heightened trivialities that comprise everyday living — this is the year where it’s imperative to accept that the series, now a smash hit, is not only leaving the bar with regularity (and some episodes are set almost entirely elsewhere in the quest for continually fresh stories), but also transitioning its focus from expert character moments to expert laughs (as if you didn’t quite get the memo in the latter half of Season Four). In other words, by Season Five, comedy has become more of the guiding factor in each script, necessitating an increase in the exaggerated farce, the broader beats, and the occasional breaches of truthfulness. However, the show mitigates this hurdle by maintaining a fairly consistent level of quality (which nevertheless leaves room for the occasional dud), and by presenting humor that makes this evolution seem conclusively worthwhile.
But all of these changes are overshadowed by the inevitable departure of Diane, which, despite not being firmly made public until the middle of the ’86-’87 season, actually seems a forgone conclusion from the year’s premiere. Interestingly, once Long made definite to the producers her intention to leave the series (in December of ’86, after the engagement was written and filmed), rumors circulated that the show was going to make Diane increasingly unlikable as a subliminal tactic to break the audience’s investment in the character. Even today, there are many fans who believe that the series does make her progressively more annoying after this development, and even I must admit to feeling similarly during earlier viewings. However, watching the entire series in chronological order and in a more focused context, I now don’t think Diane’s personality is written any differently post-engagement — well, except for the fact that her gradual assimilation into the group, a major arc in the first two seasons, goes into total regression, as she begins to feel more and more like the outsider. (But this idea was already part of several stories in Season Four and noticeable in the scripting of many of the fifth season’s earlier entries — likely due to what’s discussed below.)
Rather, I think Diane is more unlikable (in fact, VERY unlikable) in the first half of the season — before anyone knew officially that Long was leaving — in which Diane actively pursues Sam with an intensity that’s not only too extreme to be relatable, but also comes dangerously close to alienating an audience who is otherwise crusading for their reunion. But because the last two years that Sam/Diane spent apart were more angled by his lingering pursuit of her (or his unspoken knowingness that they would fall back into one another), I can understand the decision to make her, once again, the driving force in a reconciliation. In this case, it wouldn’t be Sam’s lust (or even Diane’s lust) that was drawing them to a reunion — it would be her staunch belief that they were soulmates. It’s actually a sizable change, and I think it makes for a difficult point to accept: now she’s absolutely sure that they’re meant to be — with not even some doubt, like she held in Season Two? You see, it’s not completely buyable, and as a result, we hold it against her, especially when her behavior verges on the stalker-ish extreme. Additionally, we come to like Sam way more than we like Diane; the balance that once existed, and was probably more towards her favor in the first two seasons, has been altered irreparably.
But that’s not all; after more than four years of their back and forth, the pair’s dynamic is starting to grate, and that’s really the bigger problem with the continued shenanigans of Season Five’s Sam/Diane arc. (In this regard, it’s more understandable why the show felt that it needed to progress the relationship — even at the temporary expense of Diane.) While the first half of the year is the final chapter of this will-they-won’t-they saga, once Sam and Diane are engaged, a development that isn’t totally logical but ultimately works because of the humor with which the show imbues each episode, the scripts are allowed to explore an extended arc that’s fresh, fun, and gives the audience a break from the contrivances that came before. And although we know the end is nigh for Sam/Diane, we also get a tiny reward in their seeming half-season of happiness. This doesn’t completely fix what was done to Diane and their relationship in the beginning of the year, but the lack of sustained irrationality makes for provisional enjoyment — both for those who love them together, believing the development to be right, and also to those who appreciate their dynamic, but still think the development requires a lapse of logic.
Yet while many of the Sam/Diane offerings remain the highlight of the season (because again, the show puts most of its energy on them and therefore their installments have a higher chance of working), the ensemble continues to assert its importance, even besting Sam and Diane in certain outings, while a lot of great decisions are being made to prove that the show can and will have a life after Diane — like mining comedy from Frasier’s relationship with Lilith (Bebe Neuwirth, who appears twice in Season Five) and the expanding universes for each character; we meet Cliff’s mother, see Carla’s new house, visit Norm in the workplace, etc. And, as noted in the beginning of this reflection, there are a lot of classics here. In fact, this year holds the most classics we’ve seen yet! So all of the above nitpicks and complaints must be taken within the context of a season that is still superiorly rendered. As usual, I have picked ten episodes that I think exemplify this season’s strongest installments. For new fans, this list will give you a place to start. For seasoned fans, there might be a few surprises.
Here are my picks for the ten best episodes of Season Five. (They are in AIRING ORDER.) Every episode this season is directed by James Burrows, except two (neither of which has been highlighted below).
01) Episode 97: “The Cape Cad” (Aired: 10/02/86)
Diane follows Sam and his date up to Cape Cod.
Written by Andy Cowan & David S. Williger
If you’ve been following these posts, you’ll notice that each season has gradually taken us further outside the bar, and as noted above, by Season Five, many of the episodes on today’s list (including this one) spend a significant portion of the action on separate sets. This particular show, which begins immediately after the premiere as Diane accepts Sam’s proposal — even though he’s rescinded it following her initial rejection, concerns Diane’s stalker-ish decision to go up to an inn on Cape Cod where Sam has taken a date. When Sam’s girl leaves early, he tries to keep Diane from finding out. The whole thing is overly farcical, and in fact represents a type of storytelling I wouldn’t have accepted from the series before 1986, but with great laughs and some memorable guest stars, this becomes a hysterical entry, trumping the obvious handicaps.
02) Episode 99: “Abnormal Psychology” (Aired: 10/16/86)
Frasier and Lilith find themselves attracted to one another.
Written by Janet Leahy
Following her brief appearance last season, Bebe Neuwirth returns as Dr. Lilith Sternin in this episode centered entirely around the passionate undercurrent that exists in her contentious relationship with Dr. Crane. Their lust/hate dynamic makes for fun parallels between Sam and Diane’s, but in this case, both Frasier and Lilith are highly intellectual, allowing for a more evenly matched mutual desire for superiority. The transformation of Lilith and Frasier’s visceral response to one another is a fantastic sight gag, and the entire bar getting hot by watching the two make gaga eyes at each other on live television (while talking about psychiatry, mind you) makes for some really boffo laughs. Among both the season’s (and even the series’) absolute funniest offerings, this was a definite MVE contender. A favorite; a classic!
03) Episode 102: “Young Dr. Weinstein” (Aired: 11/13/86)
Sam masquerades as a doctor to bump Diane’s reservation at a fancy restaurant.
Written by Phoef Sutton
Sutton’s first script following “Don Juan Is Hell,” a highlight from the previous season, this is one of those exquisite teleplays that makes me wish that I gave out more than one MVE per year. The story involves Sam cancelling a reservation that Diane and a date have made at an exclusive restaurant so he can steal their table while under the name of a renowned heart doctor, just to get back at Diane for her initial boasting. This naturally leads to the delectable moment when Diane is denied a table, while Sam is escorted in without hesitation. However, it’s really the dialogue that makes this episode crackle and pop, as the laughs are rapid and without hesitation. My favorite joke involves Diane’s insistence that Sam and his date “sashay over” to something more their style, “the colonel’s.” Hysterical entry – sublime from open to close!
04) Episode 104: “Thanksgiving Orphans” (Aired: 11/27/86)
The Cheers gang has Thanksgiving at Carla’s.
Written by Cheri Eichen & Bill Steinkellner
What can one say about a TV classic — one that often makes “best of” lists? I discussed this installment years ago, briefly, as one of the finest Thanksgiving themed sitcom episodes of all time. Now I’m going to double down and report that this may actually be the finest Thanksgiving themed episode of all time. Although most of the action occurs outside of the bar, all of the regular characters are together (at Carla’s new house) and interacting as they normally do — with logic and hilarity. The bit involving Diane and her professor’s annual Thanksgiving feast is amusing, as is the final gag involving a pie-faced Vera (it’s the closest we’ll ever come to seeing her). But of course, the main course is the iconic food fight that erupts at the dinner table as the group waits for the darn turkey to finish cooking. The cast’s evident enjoyment is infectious, and the food fight is such a fun and unique centerpiece to an episode that was already so well written from the start. My favorite of the year — and the one here that most proves Sam and Diane are no longer the show’s sole recipe for success.
05) Episode 105: “Everyone Imitates Art” (Aired: 12/04/86)
Sam gets a poem published in a magazine while Diane’s is rejected.
Written by Heide Perlman
One of the appealing factors about this episode is that, in a time in which Diane harasses Sam, he now gets to have a little fun with her. As a result, she’s much more likable — even when crazed and caffeinated — than in any of the offerings above. Also, this is another excellently written entry, concerning Diane’s poem being rejected from publication while Sam’s submission is accepted. That’s an easy, but delicious, idea for a story right there. But when Diane reads Sam’s piece, she knows she’s heard it before, leading to a feverish quest to prove that Sam is a plagiarist. Of course, the twist is that Sam submitted one of the old poems she had written for him, meaning that Diane really did get published after all. It’s a bit cutesy, but because the brief possibility of Sam being a better poet than Diane is dangled, it’s all comedically welcome. Fun.
06) Episode 108: “Chambers Vs. Malone” (Aired: 01/08/87)
Sam and Diane end up in court after a botched proposal.
Written by David Angell
Okay, this episode is problematic. Diane spends the entire first act insisting that Sam will propose to her today. It’s the most obnoxious she is all season (for all the reasons discussed above in my intro), especially because when Sam does propose, she turns him down — again. I suppose her conduct is so frustrating that we can’t help but laugh. But then the question of Sam physically hurting Diane is raised, and that’s an even more difficult line to tread, especially because, no matter how they’ve written her, that idea is not funny. However, by the time we reach the court room scene, the show is in full farce mode (with big laughs everywhere), which seems to justify all that came before. It’s gimmicky, it’s broad, it’s nonsensical. But it’s funny. And because this is such a big moment for Sam and Diane, the larger-than-life-ness is warranted.
07) Episode 113: “One Last Fling” (Aired: 02/12/87)
Sam and Diane give each other a 24-hour hall pass.
Written by Cheri Eichen & Bill Steinkellner
A lot of the humor in this episode is built entirely on the premise. It’s another pretty easy one from which the show can get laughs — Diane grants Sam a 24-hour break to sow his wild oats before finally committing to her. But when she announces that she too will do the same, he spends his whole 24 hours spying on her. It’s the kind of fare that works well for these two, even though we’ve long become accustomed to what’s likely going to (and does) happen. I’m actually more intrigued by the build-up that gets us there, in which the guys throw Sam a bachelor party, where Woody has the (dumb) idea of having Diane jump out of a cake dressed as a stripper. The bit is very funny, because we know what’s coming, while Sam, who’s shooting his mouth off about being tied down, doesn’t. Another smart Eichen/Steinkellner script.
08) Episode 115: “Dinner At Eight-ish” (Aired: 02/26/87)
Sam and Diane come to dinner at Frasier and Lilith’s place.
Written by Phoef Sutton
Because the meat of this story takes place not at the bar, but on the single set of Frasier and Lilith’s apartment (the pair have just become POSSLQs), this installment, during those apartment segments at least, feels like the one acts that used to typify the early seasons of the show. It’s just those four characters, arguing about various secrets they’ve kept from one another — specifically, Lilith’s not knowing about Frasier’s serious relationship with Diane (or the fact that they also lived together at one point). Sutton’s script, once again, is a comedic delight, with joke after joke after joke, and all of them true winners, making for yet another one of the smartest offerings from the season, eschewing cheap humor for bits that are rooted in character and their established histories. One of my personal favorites — all jokes from character beats!
09) Episode 115: “Simon Says” (Aired: 03/05/87)
A marriage counselor predicts doom for Sam and Diane.
Written by Peter Casey & David Lee
And if there weren’t enough episodes around to make choosing an MVE a difficult feat, here comes this installment, guest starring John Cleese (yes, the John Cleese) as a marriage counselor friend of Frasier’s who agrees to give Sam and Diane a session. Naturally, he predicts nothing but disaster for the pair and encourages them not to marry. Naturally, Diane won’t accept his verdict and believing him to be merely testing their resolve, decides to prove to him that his rushed judgment is indeed inaccurate. Everything that’s wrong about the Sam and Diane relationship is revealed in their session with Cleese’s character, and the unfolding ramifications are a veritable scream, perfectly proving his initial point. Cleese won an Emmy for his work in this hysterical episode, which again, is another one of my top favorites from the entire series.
10) Episode 121: “I Do, Adieu” [a.k.a. “I Do And Adieu”] (Aired: 05/07/87)
Diane has an opportunity that may interfere with her plans to marry Sam.
Written by Glen Charles & Les Charles
Diane’s last episode as a series regular is hard to view comedically because, frankly, we all know what’s coming, and to everyone but Carla, it’s not a very amusing prospect. The idea of having Sumner return is a nice callback to her character’s introduction, and while the rationalization of not being able to both get married and write a novel isn’t fully reconciled within the script, the idea of having this be the only time Diane leaves Cheers with an intent to return is powerful, because it’s different from all the other times where she vows otherwise — and Sam knows it. Sam’s daydream of their life as geriatrics has some laughs, and their final scene of dancing together to Irving Berlin’s “What’ll I Do?” is a tearjerker. Ultimately, a fitting end to this breathtakingly nuanced character’s tenure, bringing back the humanity that this season reduced.
Other notable episodes that narrowly missed the list above include: “The Proposal,” which is worthwhile mostly for the boat scene where Sam is enraged when Diane turns down his proposal (a popular entry that I don’t think is well written enough to overcome the story beats), “Knights Of The Scimitar,” which features some engaging Sam/Diane moments and a moderately amusing Cliff/Norm story, and “Diamond Sam,” in which Sam overcompensates after buying Diane a fake diamond engagement ring (a few nice laughs here, but some saccharine too). There are several other episodes of “honorable mention” quality, but only the three above were seriously considered for inclusion on today’s list.
While most of the cold opens from Season Five are sufficiently enjoyable, none are of exceptional merit or memorability to warrant mention. Stay tuned next week for Season Six!
*** The MVE Award for the Best Episode from Season Five of Cheers goes to…..
Come back next Tuesday for the best from the sixth season! And tune in tomorrow for a new Wildcard Wednesday post!
This is the first season that I saw much of this show, and I’ve enjoyed episodes like “Thanksgiving Orphans” greatly. I didn’t care as much for “Dinner at Eight-ish”, since I hadn’t seen much of Frasier and none of Lilith before, and I wondered who those 2 weird characters speaking so strangely were.
I’m surprised that you’ve left out of both your list and your honorable mentions my favorite episode from this season, “Cheers: the Motion Picture”. Did you like this one anyway? I loved the bits in the film made for Woody’s parents, like the man falling out the window behind Frasier and how the people in the apartment where Cliff had just delivered mail traded mail that he’s just misdelivered. For me this was all topped by Diane’s pretentious re-editing of the film as “Un Film de Diane Chambers”, with a nuclear explosion thrown in for emphasis. It didn’t support any overall story arc, but to me it stands alone as a nice, very funny episode. I also have a favorite from Season 6, but I’ll mention that next week. :)
Hi, Jon! Thanks for reading and commenting.
I didn’t mention “Cheers: The Motion Picture” because it was never in contention for today’s list. I know it’s a popular entry, but I think it’s among the season’s least intelligent — from the contrived premise of Woody possibly having to leave the series (we’ve discussed in the past why stories like this simply don’t work — for any show) to the overarching gimmick of using the two edited films as the offering’s primary source of comedy, it’s far from a favorite!
Principally, I don’t feel that the humor is enough to justify devoting the majority of the installment to the two presentations, which not only reject everything that makes CHEERS special (the multi-cam design), but also function as a very cheap, and easy, source of laughs. I do, however, think that Sutton’s script keeps each character true to his/her design, but the machinations of the episodic situation disguise what does work about the installment, instead highlighting how far beneath the series this concept is, employing a device that otherwise lessens the value of character comedy in favor of circumstantial comedy.
If you haven’t seen much of the earlier seasons, I highly recommend checking them out — while I might argue that CHEERS becomes a funnier show starting in 1986, it’s never as well written as it was in years prior!
I never liked “Cheers: The Motion Picture” either and now that I think of it the episode sort of shows what you were saying about Diane being portrayed as an outsider instead of someone still trying to fit in. I did laugh at some of the clips in the first version of the film though.
But one episode that I do enjoy, maybe not more than the ones you listed , is “Tan & Wash”. Do you like that one?
Hi, Elaine! Thanks for reading and commenting.
Yes, I do like “Tan ‘N’ Wash.” I would consider it of “honorable mention” quality.
The two Frasier-Lilith episodes are both classics, and in coming seasons, to me, they will become the two best characters during the second half of CHEERS’ 11-year run.
Hi, Guy! Thanks for reading and commenting.
Agreed, and I think the Frasier/Lilith offerings have a higher “batting average” (so to speak) than many installments thrown to other members of the ensemble, as will be evidenced in the weeks to come. Stay tuned!
Between Rebecca and Diane, which do you think was the funnier and more interesting character, and why? Also, how do you think the Rebecca character changed the overall tone and structure of the show?
Hi, David! Thanks for reading and commenting.
Don’t worry — my thoughts on Rebecca will be forthcoming in each of the CHEERS posts ahead! (In fact, there’ll be plenty to discuss on that front!) I will tell you now that Diane had the advantage of being on the series when it was better written, hence my clear preference for the “Diane era” over the “Rebecca era.” However, Alley brought elements to the show that Long didn’t and couldn’t, so underwriting one out of favor for the other means ignoring a lot of great moments! Stay tuned…
Honestly, by this season Sam and Diane’s on again/off again, will they/won’t they, I love you/I hate you, they’re engaged/they’re not engaged relationship really began to annoy me and, honestly, I was glad to see Diane leave the series. Don’t get me wrong, I loved Sam and Diane’s relationship in the beginning, but after five years of the same thing, it just really began to try my patience.
Hi, Tom! Thanks for reading and commenting.
I generally agree, but only because of the damage done to the relationship, and Diane in particular, during the first half of this year. Sans this narrative weight, Season Six is, irrespective of anything else, a breath of fresh air; stay tuned…
I may be the only one but I enjoyed the Rebecca years better. Diane grated on my nerves after awhile. Cheers is still one of my favorite sitcoms though. None of today’s sitcoms come even close.
You’re not the only one. I think the Rebecca years were funnier, if not more logical or dramatically fulfilling. Some of CHEERS’ greatest episodes are contained in these later seasons.
Hi, Smitty! Thanks for reading and commenting.
Guy’s right. You’re definitely not the only one, and in fact, I don’t think your opinion is uncommon. If people don’t hinge their preference for Rebecca’s era on a dislike of Diane (or Sam/Diane), their favor generally stems from the heightened humor of the later seasons. I would say that the series gets bolder with its comedic aims and often has a higher quotient of laughs per episode. But with higher highs also come lower lows. Stay tuned…
Yeah, the laughs are often big in the later years, but there much less consistent. With the early seasons, even the episodes that aren’t great are still mostly good. When I think of bad CHEERS episodes (and don’t throw rocks, guys, because I’m sure it can be agreed that there are some bad episodes) I think more of them come from after Long’s era. That said- I do have many favorites coming up!
I mostly agree. There ARE more duds in the later seasons because maintaining quality becomes harder, as it would for any long-running series. To continue churning our fresh stories requires that a show make use of broader gaps in logic. From these gaps can come big laughs — but only when the audience is properly compelled to leap. Of course, let us not forget that even CHEERS’ first two seasons contain a few misfires of their own…
However, let’s preempt the Diane vs. Rebecca discussion for next week (and the five weeks following)! There’s a lot to talk about ahead…
OK. I’m excited! I rented the sixth season from the library to watch this week — I haven’t seen that year in a loooong time.
Enjoy — I’m looking forward to sharing my thoughts!
Had Shelley Long not left CHEERS, I doubt that much more could have been squeezed out of Sam and Diane’s relationship as it had stood for five seasons. I think the pair would have had to have been allowed to finally marry, if only to bring something fresh to the show.
I could, of course, be quite wrong about that. Maybe it’s my own impatience with the pair by the time I get to season five. Honestly, the on again/off again nature of their relationship had just become wearying to me by the time I get to this last batch of shows.
Hi, Nick! Thanks for reading and commenting.
I agree, and while I don’t think the producers were blindsided by Long’s confirmation that she would not renew for the sixth season (in mid-December 1986), up until that point it was still feasible that she might change her mind and re-up. In fact, the engagement episode had already been written and produced, and I don’t think the first 13 episodes would have been as agonizing as they were if the show wasn’t fully committed to ending the back and forth — one way (her departure) or another (wedlock).
Interestingly, once Danson renewed and Long didn’t, the producers briefly toyed with the idea of killing Diane off and making Sam a single father. (Thank goodness this never happened — death and a baby would have made for two VERY bad decisions!) Once the decision was made on how to split them, the producers engaged in a half-hearted attempt to keep the real ending for Sam/Diane from being leaked, shooting an alternate ending in which they did actually marry. Check it out here: http://jacksonupperco.com/2014/05/07/company-cheers-some-wildcard-wednesday-treats/
Did “Spellbound” get any consideration for your Season 5 list? I thought the scene where Nick tries to woo Diane with a romantic dinner, then after Diane rejects him, tries to convince Loretta it was all for her, was one of the funniest in the shows history.
Hi, Tim! Thanks for reading and commenting.
I have never been a fan of “Spellbound,” but I gave it extra attention when compiling this post because of the knowledge that it is fairly popular among fans of the series. Unfortunately, my most recent viewings confirmed my previous position. As with several Nick/Loretta installments, I feel that the excursion functions solely as a showcase for them — at the expense of the weekly regulars, even Carla. In fact, that overbearing focus is exacerbated in this particular installment because of THE TORTELLIS, the ill-fated spin-off that premiered on the same evening as “Spellbound”; the episode is clearly designed as a means of drawing viewers into the new series. As a result, I don’t think the offering does a strong enough job of crafting a script that disguises its functional goals with the necessary comedic dressings. And while I don’t think the episode is without laughs, I also don’t think it maximizes what we like most about the series: the core characters.
Furthermore, Nick is a broad character and he has to be used judiciously; the most effective way to utilize him involves an emotional integration with the other characters, often Carla, that supports the heightened comedy and allows him to exist with at least a modicum of logical motivation. From the early seasons, I think “Battle Of The Exes” and “If Ever I Would Leave You” do the best job of doing this without forsaking the big laughs. (My primary problem with the latter, however, is what that particular script does to the depictions of the other characters, manipulating them to fit the needs of the story in ways that don’t ring completely true.) I do appreciate Nick, however, and my favorite of his appearances is upcoming. Stay tuned…
I was actually going to save this question til the final season but anyway:
When was the news released that the spinoff Frasier was coming and were people worried due to the fact that it’s last spinoff The Tortilles was critically panned
Hi, Track! Thanks for reading and commenting.
I’m sure there was apprehension on all sides about another spin-off in light of the last try. But any spin-off is a gamble, even if you’re using peripheral characters (like Nick and Loretta) or former regulars (like Frasier). In fact, Grammer was reportedly offered a Frasier show of his own years before CHEERS ended, and the decision was made, by all involved, not to risk jeopardizing two shows (CHEERS and the possible new series) for something that may not work. But cut to years later when CHEERS was finally wrapping, the process of Grammer moving onto another series — as Dr. Frasier Crane instead of a new character — was actually not a forgone conclusion, due to qualms regarding the character’s viability outside the bar; we’ll discuss more of this when we cover FRASIER here in 2017! Stay tuned…
Your take on FRASIER the series will be something worth looking forward to next year. Tonally, it is so much different than CHEERS, yet there are days when I see episodes of FRASIER and believe it to be virtually on par with the excellence of CHEERS–even though FRASIER (which also lasted 11 seasons) existed well below the radar of pop culture consciousness compared to CHEERS, which was a juggernaut everyone knew about.
Thanks! I’m looking forward to it as well. FRASIER’s early seasons are sensational, but when looking at both series collectively, I undoubtedly prefer CHEERS; FRASIER is handicapped by the difference in quality between its finest year(s) and its weakest year(s) — a gap with which CHEERS was able to minimize adroitly. As you know, I cite CHEERS with high praise for maintaining a quality that no other series with as much longevity (or anywhere near its longevity) has been able to muster, FRASIER included. But on its best days, FRASIER is the smartest show of its decade, and a masterwork — something worthy of attention and discussion! So it’s going to be a pleasure to cover here (next summer, most likely). As always, stay tuned…
Will Frasier be the first 90’s sitcom you’ll review?
No. The first show that will launch us into the 1990s entirely (not counting all the ’80s shows that take us there) is SEINFELD, even though the pilot technically premiered in 1989.